Version Control

A Novel

$25.00 US
Audio | Random House Audio
On sale Feb 23, 2016 | 18 Hours and 52 Minutes | 978-0-399-56946-3
Sales rights: World
An NPR, GQ, and Buzzfeed Best Book of the Year
One of The Washington Post’s best science fiction and fantasy books of the year

The acclaimed author of The Dream of Perpetual Motion returns with a compelling novel about the effects of science and technology on our friendships, our love lives, and our sense of self. 

Rebecca Wright has reclaimed her life, finding her way out of her grief and depression following a personal tragedy years ago. She spends her days working in customer support for the internet dating site where she first met her husband. But she has a strange, persistent sense that everything around her is somewhat off-kilter: she constantly feels as if she has walked into a room and forgotten what she intended to do there; on TV, the President seems to be the wrong person in the wrong place; her dreams are full of disquiet. Meanwhile, her husband's decade-long dedication to his invention, the causality violation device (which he would greatly prefer you not call a “time machine”) has effectively stalled his career and made him a laughingstock in the physics community. But he may be closer to success than either of them knows or can possibly imagine.

Version Control
is about a possible near future, but it’s also about the way we live now. It’s about smart phones and self-driving cars and what we believe about the people we meet on the Internet. It’s about a couple, Rebecca and Philip, who have experienced a tragedy, and about how they help—and fail to help—each other through it. Emotionally powerful and stunningly visionary, Version Control will alter the way you see your future and your present.
As the second segment began, Rebecca reflected that Philip wasn’t coming off quite as coldly as she’d feared he might. It helped that in addition to getting him to sit for an interview, the crew had shot a good deal of additional B-roll footage of him working in the lab, and though it was clearly staged, it served to humanize him. (“They asked me,” he said in high dudgeon after coming home from the lab one evening, “to sit at a desk, a clean desk with nothing on it, and write. On paper. With a pencil. They said: Don’t look at the camera. Just make up some equations or something. Throw some Greek letters in them, and maybe we can get a shot of the paper, too. It was laughable, Rebecca. It was fatuous.” But fatuous or not, here was Philip sitting at his desk, dutifully scribbling away, looking like a dinner-theater actor playing the part of a scientist.)
 
“Here at Stratton University in New Jersey,” the announcer cooed, “Philip Steiner and his small but devoted team are hard at work on an idea that has captivated the imagination of humanity since the novelist H. G. Wells first conceived of it in 1895.”
 
“Oh, no,” said Alicia. “Oh no.”
 
“Philip calls it a causality violation device,” the announcer said.
 
Sitting next to Rebecca, Philip bristled. “I call it that because that’s what it is!” Rebecca reached over and patted his hand.
 
The screen showed Philip in the lab, speaking past the camera to someone out of the field of view as Carson fiddled with machinery in the background. “There’s Carson,” said Dennis. He had finished the entire bowl of tortilla chips and wiped the bowl of salsa clean.
 
“I must have removed and reattached that robotic arm a dozen times in front of those guys,” Carson said. “That’s not even from our lab. We got it from another building.”
 
Onscreen, Philip was wearing a lab coat. He never wore a lab coat. It looked fresh from its packaging. He was cradling a robot in both arms, an eight-legged contraption of steel and plastic with a digital clock strapped to its back. “This is Arachne,” he said. “Our little causality violation detector. For all the work that’s going into this experiment, the central concept is actually pretty simple.”
 
“You’re doing good here,” said Rebecca. Despite Philip’s protestations before the party that he was generally unconcerned, he was clearly worried—he’d gone pale and tight-lipped.
 
“So,” the onscreen Philip continued, “Arachne’s clock is synced by radio to the atomic clock in Boulder, Colorado, one of the most accurate timekeeping devices in the world. Here’s the idea: We send Arachne into the causality violation chamber, retrieve her a few moments later, and see if the clock she’s carrying is still synced to the clock in Boulder. If Arachne’s clock is running faster—and if all works perfectly, we’d expect her clock to be about an hour faster— then that’ll mean that she’s existed for a longer period of time relative to the scientists who are observing her. Which would mean, in turn, that we had successfully created a causality violation.”
 
“In short—” the announcer said.
 
“Oh no,” said Alicia. “—if Philip Steiner is successful, he will have built—”
 
“She’s actually going to say it—”
 
The announcer gasped. “The world’s first time machine,” she said.
 
“Goddamn it,” Alicia said. “I knew they’d take that corny angle.”
 
They saw a rapid series of clips from twentieth-century movies: an open-shirted Rod Taylor rescuing Yvette Mimieux from a rubberfaced Morlock; the USS Nimitz appearing in Pearl Harbor a day before the fateful attack; Michael J. Fox stepping out of the gull wing door of a modified DeLorean.
 
“This is so embarrassing,” Alicia said, while Philip quietly clenched his fist and the rest of the physicists stared at the television in despair. “And oh hey look, without even telling us, they went out and got an interview with Anne Lippincott for this dog-and-pony show. Ridiculous.”
 
Anne Lippincott, according to the banner displayed at the bottom of the screen, was a representative of the Committee for Ethical Restraint in Science. “Well, of course it’s unethical,” she said, gesturing wildly with one long-fingered hand while she brushed a flaxen lock of hair back behind her ear with the other. “If these positively amoral people are going to go and honest-to-goodness rip a hole in the spacetime continuum, then that’s something that affects everyone—we all have to live on this planet together, and it’s something they shouldn’t even think about doing without first consulting the American people, so we can put it to a vote. You got all sorts of stuff going on now that’s unethical, that’s amoral—you got that business with the stem cells, you got people eating steaks that didn’t even come off a cow—and now we’ve got these absolutely reckless people who just can’t imagine that there is even one piece of knowledge that God just might have chosen to place off-limits for a reason, that maybe God made space and time the way they are for a reason—”
 
“Turn this off,” Philip growled. “I don’t want to see any more.”
 
Rebecca quietly pressed a button on her phone. The television burped a little ditty and went black, shutting off Lippincott’s rant in mid-sentence.
 
“That’s it,” Alicia said to the rest of the silent group. “We’re screwed.”
The Washington Post: Best Science Fiction & Fantasy for February
iO9: SF & Fantasy “Books you absolutely must not miss in February”
Book Riot: 5 Books to Watch for in February
BuzzFeed: 5 Novels to Read in March
A PW Picks Book of the Week for 2/22
Google Play: Best Books of Spring
 
“It's easily one of the smartest, most unusual time-travel stories you'll ever read—and one you don't need a PhD. to understand, because it's focused entirely on some very fascinating and flawed characters. . . . Like J.K. Rowling, Palmer understands that when your subject is utterly fantastic, you need to cloak it in everyday language. . . . A hymn to science as it should be done.”
      —Chris Taylor, Mashable

“Deftly exploring a huge range of subjects from relationships to technology to race and much more, Version Control is brilliant and richly satisfying: a novel that is utterly true to the complicated and science fictional world we live in today. . . . [Palmer delivers] tricky, subtle surprises.”
      —Isaac Fitzgerald, BuzzFeed Books

“Expansive in scope. . . . But [Palmer] deftly keeps the many components in harmony. The result is an intellectual novel that feels surprisingly intimate and accessible. Weighty yet emotionally rewarding, Version Control will appeal to all curious readers.” 
     —Stephenie Harrison, BookPage 

“Dexter Palmer’s Version Control explores the complexities of narrative. . . . With time travel as a fascinating backdrop, Palmer delicately examines the layers of stories we create when trying to differentiate ‘the information from the truth.’”
      —Nancy Hightower, The Washington Post

"A knowing, frequently funny and often very sad novel that explores love, marriage and loss in the age of social media and perpetual online metrics. . . . Heartfelt and harrowing. . . . Rather than presenting a setting ravaged by climate change, zombies or a deadly virus, Palmer does something more subtle, presenting a version of the modern world amplified by only a few degrees of futurity and made all the more engrossing and strange for its nearness."
      —Michael Berry, San Francisco Chronicle

“A thoughtful, powerful overhaul of the age-old time travel tale, one that doesn't radically deconstruct the genre so much as explore it more broadly and deeply. . . . Palmer is a novelist with an abundance of things to say—about life, about time, and about the essence of the universe. Luckily, with Version Control, he also has the chops and eloquence to make those things sing. . . .  Palmer has given us a vertigo-inducing peek behind the veil of existence, then distilled it into a quiet, intimate tale of a couple and the trauma that binds them. It’s exhilarating. It's exhausting. And the ending is a virtuoso performance that yanks the brain as it disorients the heart.”
      —Jason Heller, NPR Books

“You know those books that have not only an amazing plot but such a smart view of the world and pop culture that you want to read every sentence aloud to someone, even if there’s no one there? This is one of those books. . . . If you enjoyed books that challenge the classic narrative structure like Fates & Furies or books with satirical near-future settings like Oryx & Crake, you must get [Version Control] immediately.”
     —BookRiot 

“A fascinating journey that deserves to be savored with time to think, ponder, and process. . . . If you want a book that pulls you into a world that’s just different enough to be fascinating and thought-provoking, then pick this one up. Savor it . . . and enjoy where this one takes you.”
       —GraphicPolicy.com
  
“It’s February, and I’m certain this will be one of my favorite books of the year. . . . Wise, immersive, and brilliant. . . . A mind-bending tour of the science and ramifications of the causality violation device that reminded me of how I felt after I first saw the movie The Matrix.”
     —Nelson Appell, The Missourian

“Far more than a standard-model time travel saga. . . . Palmer’s lengthy, complex, highly challenging second novel is more brilliant than his debut, The Dream of Perpetual Motion. . . . Palmer earned his doctorate from Princeton with a thesis on the works of James Joyce, Thomas Pynchon, and William Gaddis. This book stands with the masterpieces of those authors.” 
     —Publishers Weekly, A PW Picks Book of the Week (starred, boxed review)

“Mind-bending. . . . A compelling, thought-provoking view of time and reality.”
     —Booklist (starred review)

“Palmer presents a fresh twist on the time-travel trope. . . . The characters are complex and flawed but thoroughly worthy of attention. Fans of Palmer's previous book, time travel, near-future technologies, and sf will find great enjoyment here.”
     —Library Journal (starred review)

“A Mobius strip of a novel in which time is more a loop than a path and various possibilities seem to exist simultaneously. Science fiction provides a literary launching pad for this audacious sophomore novel by Palmer. It offers some of the same pleasures as one of those state-of-the-union (domestic and national) epics by Jonathan Franzen, yet its speculative nature becomes increasingly apparent. . . . A novel brimming with ideas, ambition, imagination, and possibility yet one in which the characters remain richly engaging for the reader.”
      —Kirkus Reviews (starred review)

“Dexter Palmer’s Version Control is a gripping page-turner, an insightful and wise look into the lives of scientists, a moving time-distortion story, and a clever satire about our current information age. I enjoyed the heck out of it.”
    —Jeff VanderMeer, bestselling author of The Southern Reach Trilogy

“Is it a time machine? You be the judge. I’ll just say it’s a wise, sweet, and deeply unsettling story—a brilliant dystopian vision of some possible futures awaiting us, the children of the Information Age.” 
     —James Gleick, author of The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood

“Funny, poignant, and powerful—this novel is a multiverse, bursting with complexity and richness. Every time I thought it was done revealing layers of reality, it surprised me with yet another of its many worlds. And in each of those worlds, Dexter Palmer explores so many big things: race, science, philosophy, marriage, and personal histories growing together and apart and together again. It’s a moving story about love and loss, and the lifelong tangle of the possible with the inevitable.”
     —Charles Yu, author of How to Live Safely in a Science Fictional Universe and Sorry Please Thank You

About

An NPR, GQ, and Buzzfeed Best Book of the Year
One of The Washington Post’s best science fiction and fantasy books of the year

The acclaimed author of The Dream of Perpetual Motion returns with a compelling novel about the effects of science and technology on our friendships, our love lives, and our sense of self. 

Rebecca Wright has reclaimed her life, finding her way out of her grief and depression following a personal tragedy years ago. She spends her days working in customer support for the internet dating site where she first met her husband. But she has a strange, persistent sense that everything around her is somewhat off-kilter: she constantly feels as if she has walked into a room and forgotten what she intended to do there; on TV, the President seems to be the wrong person in the wrong place; her dreams are full of disquiet. Meanwhile, her husband's decade-long dedication to his invention, the causality violation device (which he would greatly prefer you not call a “time machine”) has effectively stalled his career and made him a laughingstock in the physics community. But he may be closer to success than either of them knows or can possibly imagine.

Version Control
is about a possible near future, but it’s also about the way we live now. It’s about smart phones and self-driving cars and what we believe about the people we meet on the Internet. It’s about a couple, Rebecca and Philip, who have experienced a tragedy, and about how they help—and fail to help—each other through it. Emotionally powerful and stunningly visionary, Version Control will alter the way you see your future and your present.

Excerpt

As the second segment began, Rebecca reflected that Philip wasn’t coming off quite as coldly as she’d feared he might. It helped that in addition to getting him to sit for an interview, the crew had shot a good deal of additional B-roll footage of him working in the lab, and though it was clearly staged, it served to humanize him. (“They asked me,” he said in high dudgeon after coming home from the lab one evening, “to sit at a desk, a clean desk with nothing on it, and write. On paper. With a pencil. They said: Don’t look at the camera. Just make up some equations or something. Throw some Greek letters in them, and maybe we can get a shot of the paper, too. It was laughable, Rebecca. It was fatuous.” But fatuous or not, here was Philip sitting at his desk, dutifully scribbling away, looking like a dinner-theater actor playing the part of a scientist.)
 
“Here at Stratton University in New Jersey,” the announcer cooed, “Philip Steiner and his small but devoted team are hard at work on an idea that has captivated the imagination of humanity since the novelist H. G. Wells first conceived of it in 1895.”
 
“Oh, no,” said Alicia. “Oh no.”
 
“Philip calls it a causality violation device,” the announcer said.
 
Sitting next to Rebecca, Philip bristled. “I call it that because that’s what it is!” Rebecca reached over and patted his hand.
 
The screen showed Philip in the lab, speaking past the camera to someone out of the field of view as Carson fiddled with machinery in the background. “There’s Carson,” said Dennis. He had finished the entire bowl of tortilla chips and wiped the bowl of salsa clean.
 
“I must have removed and reattached that robotic arm a dozen times in front of those guys,” Carson said. “That’s not even from our lab. We got it from another building.”
 
Onscreen, Philip was wearing a lab coat. He never wore a lab coat. It looked fresh from its packaging. He was cradling a robot in both arms, an eight-legged contraption of steel and plastic with a digital clock strapped to its back. “This is Arachne,” he said. “Our little causality violation detector. For all the work that’s going into this experiment, the central concept is actually pretty simple.”
 
“You’re doing good here,” said Rebecca. Despite Philip’s protestations before the party that he was generally unconcerned, he was clearly worried—he’d gone pale and tight-lipped.
 
“So,” the onscreen Philip continued, “Arachne’s clock is synced by radio to the atomic clock in Boulder, Colorado, one of the most accurate timekeeping devices in the world. Here’s the idea: We send Arachne into the causality violation chamber, retrieve her a few moments later, and see if the clock she’s carrying is still synced to the clock in Boulder. If Arachne’s clock is running faster—and if all works perfectly, we’d expect her clock to be about an hour faster— then that’ll mean that she’s existed for a longer period of time relative to the scientists who are observing her. Which would mean, in turn, that we had successfully created a causality violation.”
 
“In short—” the announcer said.
 
“Oh no,” said Alicia. “—if Philip Steiner is successful, he will have built—”
 
“She’s actually going to say it—”
 
The announcer gasped. “The world’s first time machine,” she said.
 
“Goddamn it,” Alicia said. “I knew they’d take that corny angle.”
 
They saw a rapid series of clips from twentieth-century movies: an open-shirted Rod Taylor rescuing Yvette Mimieux from a rubberfaced Morlock; the USS Nimitz appearing in Pearl Harbor a day before the fateful attack; Michael J. Fox stepping out of the gull wing door of a modified DeLorean.
 
“This is so embarrassing,” Alicia said, while Philip quietly clenched his fist and the rest of the physicists stared at the television in despair. “And oh hey look, without even telling us, they went out and got an interview with Anne Lippincott for this dog-and-pony show. Ridiculous.”
 
Anne Lippincott, according to the banner displayed at the bottom of the screen, was a representative of the Committee for Ethical Restraint in Science. “Well, of course it’s unethical,” she said, gesturing wildly with one long-fingered hand while she brushed a flaxen lock of hair back behind her ear with the other. “If these positively amoral people are going to go and honest-to-goodness rip a hole in the spacetime continuum, then that’s something that affects everyone—we all have to live on this planet together, and it’s something they shouldn’t even think about doing without first consulting the American people, so we can put it to a vote. You got all sorts of stuff going on now that’s unethical, that’s amoral—you got that business with the stem cells, you got people eating steaks that didn’t even come off a cow—and now we’ve got these absolutely reckless people who just can’t imagine that there is even one piece of knowledge that God just might have chosen to place off-limits for a reason, that maybe God made space and time the way they are for a reason—”
 
“Turn this off,” Philip growled. “I don’t want to see any more.”
 
Rebecca quietly pressed a button on her phone. The television burped a little ditty and went black, shutting off Lippincott’s rant in mid-sentence.
 
“That’s it,” Alicia said to the rest of the silent group. “We’re screwed.”

Praise

The Washington Post: Best Science Fiction & Fantasy for February
iO9: SF & Fantasy “Books you absolutely must not miss in February”
Book Riot: 5 Books to Watch for in February
BuzzFeed: 5 Novels to Read in March
A PW Picks Book of the Week for 2/22
Google Play: Best Books of Spring
 
“It's easily one of the smartest, most unusual time-travel stories you'll ever read—and one you don't need a PhD. to understand, because it's focused entirely on some very fascinating and flawed characters. . . . Like J.K. Rowling, Palmer understands that when your subject is utterly fantastic, you need to cloak it in everyday language. . . . A hymn to science as it should be done.”
      —Chris Taylor, Mashable

“Deftly exploring a huge range of subjects from relationships to technology to race and much more, Version Control is brilliant and richly satisfying: a novel that is utterly true to the complicated and science fictional world we live in today. . . . [Palmer delivers] tricky, subtle surprises.”
      —Isaac Fitzgerald, BuzzFeed Books

“Expansive in scope. . . . But [Palmer] deftly keeps the many components in harmony. The result is an intellectual novel that feels surprisingly intimate and accessible. Weighty yet emotionally rewarding, Version Control will appeal to all curious readers.” 
     —Stephenie Harrison, BookPage 

“Dexter Palmer’s Version Control explores the complexities of narrative. . . . With time travel as a fascinating backdrop, Palmer delicately examines the layers of stories we create when trying to differentiate ‘the information from the truth.’”
      —Nancy Hightower, The Washington Post

"A knowing, frequently funny and often very sad novel that explores love, marriage and loss in the age of social media and perpetual online metrics. . . . Heartfelt and harrowing. . . . Rather than presenting a setting ravaged by climate change, zombies or a deadly virus, Palmer does something more subtle, presenting a version of the modern world amplified by only a few degrees of futurity and made all the more engrossing and strange for its nearness."
      —Michael Berry, San Francisco Chronicle

“A thoughtful, powerful overhaul of the age-old time travel tale, one that doesn't radically deconstruct the genre so much as explore it more broadly and deeply. . . . Palmer is a novelist with an abundance of things to say—about life, about time, and about the essence of the universe. Luckily, with Version Control, he also has the chops and eloquence to make those things sing. . . .  Palmer has given us a vertigo-inducing peek behind the veil of existence, then distilled it into a quiet, intimate tale of a couple and the trauma that binds them. It’s exhilarating. It's exhausting. And the ending is a virtuoso performance that yanks the brain as it disorients the heart.”
      —Jason Heller, NPR Books

“You know those books that have not only an amazing plot but such a smart view of the world and pop culture that you want to read every sentence aloud to someone, even if there’s no one there? This is one of those books. . . . If you enjoyed books that challenge the classic narrative structure like Fates & Furies or books with satirical near-future settings like Oryx & Crake, you must get [Version Control] immediately.”
     —BookRiot 

“A fascinating journey that deserves to be savored with time to think, ponder, and process. . . . If you want a book that pulls you into a world that’s just different enough to be fascinating and thought-provoking, then pick this one up. Savor it . . . and enjoy where this one takes you.”
       —GraphicPolicy.com
  
“It’s February, and I’m certain this will be one of my favorite books of the year. . . . Wise, immersive, and brilliant. . . . A mind-bending tour of the science and ramifications of the causality violation device that reminded me of how I felt after I first saw the movie The Matrix.”
     —Nelson Appell, The Missourian

“Far more than a standard-model time travel saga. . . . Palmer’s lengthy, complex, highly challenging second novel is more brilliant than his debut, The Dream of Perpetual Motion. . . . Palmer earned his doctorate from Princeton with a thesis on the works of James Joyce, Thomas Pynchon, and William Gaddis. This book stands with the masterpieces of those authors.” 
     —Publishers Weekly, A PW Picks Book of the Week (starred, boxed review)

“Mind-bending. . . . A compelling, thought-provoking view of time and reality.”
     —Booklist (starred review)

“Palmer presents a fresh twist on the time-travel trope. . . . The characters are complex and flawed but thoroughly worthy of attention. Fans of Palmer's previous book, time travel, near-future technologies, and sf will find great enjoyment here.”
     —Library Journal (starred review)

“A Mobius strip of a novel in which time is more a loop than a path and various possibilities seem to exist simultaneously. Science fiction provides a literary launching pad for this audacious sophomore novel by Palmer. It offers some of the same pleasures as one of those state-of-the-union (domestic and national) epics by Jonathan Franzen, yet its speculative nature becomes increasingly apparent. . . . A novel brimming with ideas, ambition, imagination, and possibility yet one in which the characters remain richly engaging for the reader.”
      —Kirkus Reviews (starred review)

“Dexter Palmer’s Version Control is a gripping page-turner, an insightful and wise look into the lives of scientists, a moving time-distortion story, and a clever satire about our current information age. I enjoyed the heck out of it.”
    —Jeff VanderMeer, bestselling author of The Southern Reach Trilogy

“Is it a time machine? You be the judge. I’ll just say it’s a wise, sweet, and deeply unsettling story—a brilliant dystopian vision of some possible futures awaiting us, the children of the Information Age.” 
     —James Gleick, author of The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood

“Funny, poignant, and powerful—this novel is a multiverse, bursting with complexity and richness. Every time I thought it was done revealing layers of reality, it surprised me with yet another of its many worlds. And in each of those worlds, Dexter Palmer explores so many big things: race, science, philosophy, marriage, and personal histories growing together and apart and together again. It’s a moving story about love and loss, and the lifelong tangle of the possible with the inevitable.”
     —Charles Yu, author of How to Live Safely in a Science Fictional Universe and Sorry Please Thank You